The Bottom Line:
In certain senses, this will be the least impressive division winning team in 2004. Their stars are not of the obvious sort, and yet they have high-quality players at every position. They still have the best defense in baseball, and they made significant offensive upgrades in three line up spots. Their pitching should be better this year than it was last year, and at the end of the season, they’ll be the AL West champs.
Line Up:
The M’s offense was just a bit above average last year, but
they should be much better this year. They made significant offensive upgrades
at three positions. On paper, the group is just a notch below the Angels, but
their track record for staying healthy is much better, and they should have
enough punch to find themselves in the postseason. As a group, this is still
the best defense in the American League.
Pitching:
Out of all the coulds and shoulds and woulds surrounding
the top pitching staffs in baseball, the Mariners were the only team in the AL
last year that did. It wasn’t the Yankees or the Red Sox or the A’s leading the
pack, and it won’t be the Angels this year. And they did it without ever
knowing which Freddy Garcia was going to show up. On paper they don’t have the
best starting five (though it’s up there) and the don’t have the best bullpen
(so they say), but at the end of the year this will be the best group of 11 arms
in baseball – wait and see.
M’s Pitching Note: If any
one of these guys gets hurt or becomes ineffective, they have four guys (three
in the minors and Rafael Soriano) that are ready to step in right now.
Closer Eddie Guardado, L:
After Kazuhiro Sasaki bailed, Guardado became the man. Most teams would be
worried that their closer just quite baseball, but Guardado has over 80 saves in
the last two years. In fact, if you combine the last two years, he’s been the
most effective closer in the American League. On top of all of that, the M’s
have two more options (Soriano and Shigetoshi Hasegawa) if he goes down.
| Remarkably Similar | |||||||||
| AB | R | H | HR | RBI | SB | BB | BA | OPS | |
| Bret Boone (11) | 5764 | 820 | 1554 | 221 | 901 | 80 | 468 | .270 | .777 |
| Joe Gordon (11) | 5707 | 914 | 1530 | 253 | 975 | 89 | 759 | .268 | .823 |
The Mariners had a lot of good
options for comparisons. Because the choices were so good, I’ve chosen to do
two, and I’ve done it without using obvious choices like Edgar Martinez and
Jamie Moyer. Anyway, you’re probably wondering who the heck is Joe Gordon?
Well, he was a second baseman for the Yankees from 1938-1943, he went to WWII in
’44 and ’45, came back to the Yankees in 1946, then finished out his career in
Cleveland from 1947-1950. He was an All-Star 9 times, and he won the AL MVP in
1942. Bill James believes he should be in the Hall of Fame, and for him to say
that means a whole lot. Boone is a good comparison, but Gordon still has an
edge. Boone needs three or four more solid seasons to become a legitimate
candidate.
| Remarkably Similar | |||||||||
| AB | R | H | HR | RBI | SB | BB | BA | OPS | |
| John Olerud (14) | 6994 | 1076 | 2079 | 239 | 1145 | 11 | 1198 | .297 | .873 |
| Don Mattingly (14) | 7003 | 1007 | 2153 | 222 | 1099 | 14 | 588 | .307 | .829 |
Many people argue that Mattingly
should be in the Hall of Fame. While I’m not convinced, I’m at least
willing to hear the argument. No one, however, seems to think Olerud even
has a chance (which he doesn’t) or that he should even be considered. But
look what they’ve done. It’s extremely close. Going beyond the
numbers, they were both considered the premier defensive first basemen of their
day. If you look at their season-to-season numbers though, you see a huge
difference. Mattingly was a baseball stud from 1984-1989. In three
of those years he finished in the top 5 in MVP voting, winning the award
outright in 1985. Considering the offensive standards of the mid-80’s, his
numbers in 1985 and 1986 are just staggering. Olerud, on the other hand,
has been pretty even throughout his career. He was great in 1993, winning
the batting title and leading the AL in OPS. He finished third in the MVP
voting that year, and that’s the only time he ever cracked the top ten.
Besides that year, he’s been good but not great. I guess this just goes to
show what five good years with the Yankees can be worth. Seriously though,
it's clear that Mattingly was much, much faster.
Fantasy Top 5:
Booth, from now on, you are no longer allowed to predict the Mariners winning the division. It never turns out well when you do it.
Posted by: Deacon Blues at April 26, 2004 06:02 PMIt did once.
Posted by: the booth at April 27, 2004 10:10 AMI'll try to fix it: The Anaheim Angels will most definitely win the AL West and Oakland will win the AL Wildcard. The Mariners don't stand even the slightest chance.
Posted by: the booth at April 27, 2004 10:10 AM