April 01, 2004

2004 St. Louis Cardinals Preview

The Bottom Line:
I must confess I’m confused about Walt Jocketty and the rest of the St. Louis front office. They have a generally winning tradition and the money and fan base to support it, and yet they really did nothing to address their needs during the winter. They still have one of the best hitting and fielding teams in the National League, but they also have big pitching problems from top to bottom. Meanwhile, the Cubs and Astros both made tremendous off-season improvements, taking a three-team race down to two with the Cardinals being the odd team out. Career years from the starting rotation puts the Cardinals right the playoff mix with the Cubs and Astros, but that seems very unlikely considering there proven starters have injury issues and their other starters are not proven. It’s not impossible for them to compete, in fact, they probably will until mid-August or so, but their well-rounded competitors will leave them looking up from third place.



New Page 2

Line Up:


The line up is largely the same as last year’s edition; itt
was the best in the NL.  They could be the best again, but the Astros, Cubs, and
Phillies have all taken a step forward.  Regardless of which team finishes as
“the best,” the Cardinal bats are scary.


 



  1. Marlon Anderson, 2B: After a few down years in
    Philly, Anderson became respectable again in Tampa.  He hit .270 and stole
    19 bases.  Bo Hart could win this spot.

  2. Edgar Renteria, SS: Let’s see: he won a gold
    glove, he stole 34 bases, he hit .330, and he drove in 100 (out of the #2
    spot!).  He finally earned his due and got elected to start in the All-Star
    game.  He should be able to duplicate all of those feats except the All-Star
    spot.  He’ll still be the guy that should make it, but the Japanese voters
    will make sure that Mets shortstop Kazuo Matsui gets the spot, regardless of
    how he plays.  Sorry Edgar.  Now that A-Rod has moved to third base,
    Renteria is the best all-around shortstop in baseball.

  3. Albert Pujols, 1B: One could argue that he
    should have been the MVP last year.  But rest assured, he’ll get one.  He’s
    only 24 and he have not yet seen just how great he can be.

  4. Jim Edmonds, CF: The career stats say Edmonds
    will have a better year this year (He’s on when Moises Alou is off – you can
    look it up).

  5. Scott Rolen, 3B: He’s the best third baseman in
    baseball, both at the plate and in the field, yet he’s only the fourth best
    player on the team.

  6. Reggie Sanders, RF: He the premier
    rent-a-player in the game.  He hit .285 with 31 home runs and 15 stolen
    bases for the Pirates last year.

  7. Kerry Robinson, LF: He’s the safe bet to win
    this spot, but Mark Quinn, Greg Vaughn, and Ray Lankford are all in camp
    trying to win this spot.  I’m not willing to make a guess as to who will get
    it, but I have to believe that one of those guys can emerge over Robinson.

  8. Mike Matheny, C: He’s on a very short list of
    all defense/no offense players that doesn’t really hurt the team.  He also
    seems to be a real class act.


 


Pitching:


As always, health is the key.  If this bunch can stay
healthy and effective, we’ll have a quality three-team race like the 2002 AL
West.  But the Cardinals seem to have some bad luck when it comes to pitching
health, and they’ll have to show they can stay healthy before this team gets the
kind of respect Josh Melton would like.


 



  1. Matt Morris, R: He won 22 games in 2001 and 18
    in 2002.  He did pitch in 27 games last year, but he really pitched more
    than he should have, considering the nature of his injuries and his
    importance to the staff.  It’s getting harder and harder to believe that
    Cardinal pitcher will be healthy, but I hope Morris can bounce back, just to
    make things interesting.

  2. Woody Williams, R: Williams had a career year
    last year, winning 18 games and making the All-Star team, but health
    concerns have already popped up this spring.

  3. Jeff Suppan, L: He was solid in the first half
    for Pittsburgh and terrible in the second half for Boston.  It’s hard to say
    which guy will show up this year.

  4. Chris Carpenter, R: He was good for Toronto in
    2001 and part of 2002, but he hasn’t pitched in a major league game since
    that time.

  5. Jason Marquis, R: He came over from the Braves
    in the J.D. Drew deal.  He had bounced around from AAA to Atlanta and from
    the rotation to the bullpen.  The last time the Braves parted with a guy
    like that, he turned out to be Odalis Perez.  The Braves did that a few
    years ago with another pitcher named Jason Schmidt.


Closer Jason Isringhausen, R:
When he came back from injuries, he was as effective as ever: 2.36 ERA and 41
strikeouts in 42 innings.


 


 




Remarkably Similar
AB R H HR RBI SB BB BA OPS

Albert Pujols (3) 1771 367 591 114 381 8 220 .334 1.025
Joe DiMaggio (3*) 1857 412 615 107 432 13 147 .331 .941


 


Normally, I prefer to use a player with 10 or more years of
experience, and the Cardinals have some players that qualify, but I just
couldn’t pass up on this one.  It’s not necessary to give this one deep analysis
since Pujols is only 23 and a lot can still happen.  But consider the list of
the ten players most similar to Pujols through age 23.  It contains eight Hall
of Famers (DiMaggio, Jimmie Foxx, Joe Medwick, Hank Aaron, Frank Robinson,
Orlando Cepeda, Ted Williams, Stan Musial), one current player (Vladimir
Guerrero), and Hal Trosky who somehow never even made the All-Star team.  He did
finish in the top ten in MVP voting twice, including 1936 when he hit .343 on
216 hits, scored 124 runs, with 42 homers and 162 RBI.  Judging from the list,
Pujols has about a 90% chance of becoming a Hall of Famer.


 


Fantasy Top 5:



  1. Albert Pujols

  2. Edgar Renteria

  3. Scott Rolen

  4. Jim Edmonds

  5. Jason Isringhausen

Posted by at April 1, 2004 08:46 AM
Comments

My only real point is that the Cardinals have the best offense in the NL. The Astros and Cubs have real question marks in their lineup, i.e. they need this and that to happen for them to be the best. Now, I of course admit that the Cardinals' question marks arise in their rotation. And good pitching beats good hitting. So that's why I'm worried. But, given their incredible offense, and Izzy's health (probably the biggest reason they didn't win the division last year), I think it will be a 3-horse race down to the wire. Also, sounds like Prior is out until at least May...

Posted by: UJ at April 1, 2004 09:12 AM

As for the Cardinal offense, you're right. They're the reigning champs in that category. The Phillies will contend for that honor this year too.

I'm sure the NL Central will be close. It's a shame that the team that finishes in third in this division will still be better than the team that wins the NL West

Posted by: the booth at April 1, 2004 09:20 AM

Not bad, Aaron. I'm pulling for Bo Hart (he's a favorite of mine). Thanks for the dedication, too. I think you're going to be surprised by the Cards...they'll be more competitive than you're predicting. For sure I'm gonna miss Vina, though.

Posted by: Lisa at April 1, 2004 11:39 AM

I think the only really inspiring move the Cards made in the off-season was to get rid of Fernando Vina. That and paying Tino Martinez nine million dollars to play elsewhere.

Other than that, I have to agree with you Booth. They are treading water until this stadium deal gets done. As bad as I hate to say it, the Cardinals are at best a third place team in the division.

That doesn't mean that I don't love them more than life itself. I'm just being realistic.

I'd be very happy to just sit back and watch Pujols win the triple crown.

S - T - L rePRAzent!

Posted by: Duane at April 1, 2004 02:04 PM

i gotta say, i was wrong about my predictions. it doesn't look like much of a three horse race in the central after all. the cards are sssssmokin! i'm sure i'm speaking too soon, and putting my foot in my mouth in only late july, but heck. they're beating the pants off houston and the cubbies, and i'm glad the experts didn't give st louie much of a chance. they were able to smash everyone's expectations. also, i'm a little disappointed looking back at duane's lack of faith though...:)

Posted by: UJ at July 27, 2004 04:44 PM

That's kind of the way it goes. I really can't find an expert that's consistently right more than about 50% of the time. As for me, two of my predicted division winners (Yankees and Twins) are leading their divisions, two are very much contenders (Padres and Phillies), and the other two aren't even close (Mariners and Astros). What stinks is that the two that aren't even close are the two teams closest to my heart.

Posted by: the booth at July 28, 2004 10:03 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?